Monday, March 22, 2010

Massive Change in US Student Loans Slipped in to Bill | CommonDreams.org

Massive Change in US Student Loans Slipped in to Bill | CommonDreams.org

The Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives Sunday approved President Barack Obama’s bid to implement what would be the biggest overhaul in decades of the federal student loan program.

Under the legislation, federal subsidies to private student loan lenders would stop and the government’s role in lending would increase – creating billions of dollars in projected savings that would go largely in grants to needy students.

The measure, opposed by private lenders and critics of an expanding federal government, was included in a package of proposed changes to an overhaul of the U.S. health care system.

The House passed the package after giving final approval to the health care bill that is ready for Mr. Obama to sign into law.

...

Mostly Republican critics complain the action would amount to an unwarranted government takeover of the program and reduce students’ options in securing a loan.

But primarily Democratic backers argue it would eliminate the middle men – private lenders – from the process, allowing the government to save billions of dollars.

The measure would cut banks and student loan giant Sallie Mae out of most of the $92-billion (U.S.) college student loan business and require that all federal students loans originate with the government.

Private lenders would still have a role in servicing loans, such as helping collect them. Direct federal loans, unlike loans by banks, must be serviced by U.S. workers.

“This is good for students, taxpayers and American jobs,” said House Education Committee Chairman George Miller, a Democrat.

Non-partisan congressional budget analysts project that the measure would save about $61-billion over 10 years. Savings would go increased federal grants to the neediest students as well as to other education programs, including funding of community and historically black colleges.

While the House approved the measure last year, it stalled in the Senate in the face of a threatened Republican procedural hurdle that take 60 votes in the 100-member chamber to clear.

Democrats, however, now plan to bring up the measure in a manner that would require only a simply majority, 51 votes, to pass....

No comments: